Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Press Secretariat Logo

 

 

 

 

PRESS RELEASE
11 APRIL 2016

SAMOA’S INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES

The Government of Samoa wishes to address recent news coverage concerning Samoa and the leaked “Panama Papers”, where government’s involvement through several of its agencies has been highlighted by a few news organisations.

Samoa’s international financial centre is monitored and supervised by SIFA (Samoa International Finance Authority), under which ten licensed trustee companies currently operate.
Mossack Fonseca and Co (Samoa) Limited is one of these ten licensed trustee companies.

Incorporation of international companies is the normal activity of trustee companies and clientele is spread across the globe. The services offered are frequently used and provided in many jurisdictions worldwide including the United States and the United Kingdom.
It is legal and common for companies to establish commercial entities in different jurisdictions for a variety of legitimate reasons – including conducting cross-border mergers and acquisitions, estate planning and restructuring and pooling investment capital from investors residing in different jurisdictions who want a neutral legal tax regime that does not benefit or disadvantage any one investor.

As one of the many jurisdictions offering international financial services, Samoa prides itself in leading efforts to ensure the conduct of offshore businesses in Samoa is regulated and supervised.  This is shown through the various legislative amendments and revisions of a regulatory nature that ensure compliance with international standards set by bodies such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)/Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG), the Group of International Finance Centre Supervisors (GIFCS) and the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS), to name a few.

SIFA is the Regulator and Supervisor of international company incorporations and licensed entities such as trustee companies; although trustee companies themselves are domestic entities, registered with the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Labour.

The Ministry of Foreign affairs and Trade is vested with the apostilling function, including the certification of company applications, based on advice and following a review by SIFA.  SIFA returns the apostilled documents to the Trustee companies  for them to continue their services based on the instructions from their client companies.  The fees charged by Trustee Companies to the companies requiring their services is a direct arrangement between these two parties.

On occasion, especially when companies are based in countries not party to the Hague Convention (e.g. Philippines, Vietnam, UAE), further certification is required by our Missions. This means that our Missions affix a certification stamp – which simply verifies the Chief Executive Officer of MFAT’s signature – before forwarding such documentation to the embassy of the country where the company is based, or they can also return it to the trustee company based in Samoa, depending on the specific instructions.

Where Missions are required to forward these documents, trustee companies are expected to meet the full cost of registration of these documents with foreign embassies as well as meet the full cost of courier and/or postal service charges.

In the case cited in the media report, Mossack Fonseca, after receiving the documents from SIFA, requested the Canberra Mission to arrange authentication by Australia’s DFAT, and to forward the same to the UAE Embassy for further legalization.

In reference to Samoa’s High Commission in Australia, the involvement of a senior diplomat officer at the time as inferred by the media report, was not in any way improper.  It is a standard administrative function of our Mission to ensure documents that have been duly endorsed by the relevant authorities in Samoa are remitted to the respective embassies concerned.  The correspondence alluded to involved clearance of a courier cost that the Mission was required to pay as Mossack Fonseca did not provide a return address, and in this particular instance, adequate funds to cover the courier costs.
The administrative duties performed by the Foreign Affairs diplomat in this case did not, and does not, warrant the attention or clearance of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, who is the Prime Minister of Samoa.

The regulation of the local offshore industry rests with SIFA specifically, but in matters concerning AML/CFT (Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing) – SIFA shares the load with the Money Laundering Prevention Authority (MLPA) and the Samoa Financial Intelligence Unit (SFIU) which are both under the auspices of the Central Bank of Samoa.

In matters concerning tax and the exchange of information for tax purposes, SIFA assists Samoa’s competent authority, which is the Ministry for Revenue.

In matters concerning mutual assistance in criminal matters or proceeds of crime, SIFA assists the Office of the Attorney General and the National Prosecutions Office, where necessary.

Samoa, through SIFA, is actively involved in the Peer Review Group of the ‘OECD Global Forum on Transparency and the Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes’.
The PRG has spearheaded the drive to ensure there is a level playing field when it comes to implementing the OECD Tax Initiative that lead initially to the exchange of information for tax purposes on request, to the recently adopted standard of automatic exchange of information.

Samoa has an active anti-money-laundering and counter terrorist financing regime with highly capable staff across a range of agencies.

In February of this year, the Central Bank of Samoa’s SFIU started a proactive operation, “Operation Signpost”, to uncover professional money laundering in Samoa.
Samoa is not a blacklist country in the international community, neither by the Asia Pacific Group or the Financial Action Task Force, which are the main compliance and assessor players in terms of money-laundering and counter-terrorist financing regimes worldwide.  This is due to Samoa’s strong legal frameworks to address money-laundering and counter terrorism activities, which are in accordance with international best practice and standards and compliance.

The Central Bank of Samoa and Financial Intelligence Unit have made assurances that Samoa will redouble its efforts to ensure Samoa cannot and will not be used by money launderers and tax evaders.

###

One Response to Samoa’s International Financial Services
  1. […] by Sifa, the products and prices of which are published online. He said Sifa’s operations are legal and regulated, and that Samoa is a signatory to “three or four” anti-money laundering […]


[top]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *